For it is not only Maersk and the like that make up the joint. It is also the general clerk or scho

In Denmark live world's most solidarity people. The most solidarity are the ones we call "the rich". tukf In fact, they are rich in Denmark not so rich, if you compare them with other rich in other realms, but in return the world-historical solidarity.
Until his death recently was the most solidarity of all of them well Mærsk McKinney Møller. He was so severally that when he passed away, it was announced that the local municipality may have to raise taxes by a full percentage point since Maersk solidarity could be calculated tukf at 150 million annually paid tax dollars to the municipality. It's solidarity with the weak: 150000000 spire - from one man to all others. More clinking and lingers beautifully solidarity may well bad sounds.
Now, the fact that the world's most joint and several people may appropriately be among those I have previously called the spoiled. One day in other words solidarity and bestows more than half of its income to the community. The next day you are spoiled and expect that this community - despite the large income you have, and the millions who might face in the bank - pays both children money when the time is and pension when the time comes.
So far, so good and so far as one might in principle agree with the Social Democrats' new thesis-power trio, Pernille Rosenkrantz-Theil, Anne Vang and Jens Joel who after quickly downed provocation on the new class struggle redistribution tukf of day-care centers and school level now are once again on the political barricades in the same class struggle name. This time in a showdown with the principle of universal welfare services to all, poor as rich - from just children money for pensions and on the basis of the government's tax reform tukf proposal, which exactly embark on this.
If I and others can not be sure that we get something in return, can you expect us to bother deliver as much as we do for the community that just runs away with the box without looking back or say thank you?
For it is not only Maersk and the like that make up the joint. It is also the general clerk or school teacher who is jointly and severally pay hundreds of thousands of dollars of its earnings each year so that welfare can be maintained. It is also the general clerk or school teacher who every time he or she buys at the supermarket sells 25 percent of the price of the goods to the community, so the welfare can be maintained. It is also the general clerk or school teacher, as each time they buy a car and then driving in the pay dearly for that welfare can be maintained.
Then you do not appear to be a futurist or have a master's degree from the University to predict that the confrontation with the welfare society element of pampering in a split second can evolve to also become a showdown tukf with solidarity. Not just Maersk. But many other people's enormous solidarity with the welfare of society together.
In other words, the amount of tax you pay hardly inconsequential tukf if a break with universalism should not be to the collapse of welfare. If no tax at the same time put down, hundreds of thousands of increasingly feel they are throwing money into a black hole.
Which brings me to a side track that feels tempting here. For it could be that the solidarity would remain supportive, even if Joel, Vang & Rosenkrantz-Theil got power as they heed if only they could know to be absolutely sure that the money for the community at least avoided with due respect for the solidarity they have shown in their pay huge taxes without complaining much.
If now the solidarity could be completely convinced that everything they provide for the common welfare is used where it is most needed. Where someone needs help. Where society has an obvious interest in ensuring that the money is used. In schools and education on the treatment of old and sick, the establishment of an infrastructure which means that the joint space becomes effective, nice and relatively harmless to move in. And so on. But can the solidarity now know themselves sure?
To test what is going on inside the minds of the people who have the task confided tukf to dispose of the solidariskes remitted funds to the community, I have for fun, a small stikprøvedyk down in the documents, everyone can find publicly available on municipal websites. The case is the City of Copenhagen - here's Anne Vang the mayor - and here you are as elsewhere in the process of considering how taxpayers' money should be spent in the next budget year.
The examples I am about to make, may be unjust. For many taxpayer money is obviously tied in obviously serious tasks and examples below are not yet adopted and put into the budget. It is in the process tukf of "wild ideas" tukf - or slightly lean